Preserving Electronic Evidence In The Age Of Vehicle Telematics And Wearable Tech

Our Houston Car Accident Attorneys Explain What To Know

When a serious crash happens in Houston, the evidence that determines liability can vanish quickly. What many people don’t realize is that some of the most powerful proof isn’t found in skid marks or police reports; it’s stored inside vehicles, phones, and even personal health devices.

Modern commercial trucks use telematics systems that track speed, braking, and hours of service. Passenger cars often contain black boxes, while wearable technology like smartwatches monitors health and daily activity levels. All of these sources produce valuable data that can confirm how an accident happened and the damage it caused.

Unfortunately, this evidence is often in the hands of trucking companies or insurers who are motivated to protect themselves, not victims. For injured Texans, understanding how electronic data works and how an experienced Houston personal injury lawyer can preserve it is important to holding negligent parties accountable and securing full compensation.

Varieties Of Electronic Data In Crash Claims

In a modern crash case, some of the strongest evidence comes from electronics. Cars, trucks, smartphones, and even health devices quietly record what happened before, during, and after a collision. This information is far more objective than human memory, but it must be preserved quickly or it may be lost.

The three most important categories of electronic crash evidence are:

Vehicles: Onboard systems and devices that log speed, braking, routes, and crash dynamics.
Phones: Mobile data that shows location, usage, and activity around the time of the collision.
Health Devices: Wearables and medical trackers that record physical changes after an accident.

Each category tells a different part of the story. Together, they can prove liability, show how severe the crash was, and demonstrate the personal toll of the injuries.

Vehicle Data

Modern vehicles act like rolling computers. They record far more than most drivers realize, and the information can be critical in proving fault. From showing how fast a truck was going to confirming whether brakes were applied, vehicle data creates an objective timeline of events.

Types of vehicle evidence include:

Event Data Recorders (Black Boxes): Capture speed, throttle position, braking, steering, and seatbelt use in the moments before and during impact.
Telematics Systems: Found in many commercial trucks, these track driving behavior over time, including speeding, harsh braking, and hours-of-service compliance.
GPS and Navigation Logs: Record routes, stops, and timestamps, often confirming whether a driver followed safe routes or violated rest rules.
Dashcams and OEM Cameras: Provide direct video of the road, the driver’s behavior, or the cabin at the time of the collision.
Infotainment System Logs: Store recent calls, text fragments, and navigation history from connected phones.

Because this information is usually controlled by manufacturers, trucking companies, or insurers, victims often cannot obtain it on their own. A lawyer can demand preservation of these records and ensure they are not erased or overwritten before being reviewed.

Phone Data

Nearly every driver and passenger carries a smartphone, and these devices generate a detailed log of activity. In a crash claim, phone records often determine whether a driver was distracted, and they can also demonstrate how an injury disrupted a victim’s daily life.

Types of phone evidence include:

Call and Text Logs: Show if a driver was using the phone at the exact time of impact.
App Usage Data: Records whether apps like social media or navigation were active during the crash.
Location History: Confirms where the phone (and therefore the person) was before, during, and after the collision.
Accelerometer Data: Detects sudden stops, impacts, or unusual movements consistent with a crash.
Photos, Videos, or Voice Notes: Taken at the scene, these can serve as contemporaneous evidence of damage and injuries.

This data can be powerful, but it requires careful handling to be admissible in court. Lawyers know how to subpoena records from providers, retrieve phone data properly, and counter insurer arguments about privacy or reliability.

Health Device Data

Wearables and medical devices are a newer but increasingly important source of crash evidence. They record physical changes that victims may not notice at first, helping to prove the true impact of an injury.

Types of health device evidence include:

Heart Rate Records: A sudden spike or irregular rhythm may confirm trauma or stress immediately after a crash.
Step Counts and Activity Levels: Drops in daily activity can show how injuries limit mobility.
Sleep Pattern Disruptions: Prove the long-term effects of pain, PTSD, or concussion.
Stress and Oxygen Monitoring: Metrics from advanced wearables or medical devices may reflect hidden injuries or breathing issues.
Medical Telemetry Devices: Pacemakers, glucose monitors, or home monitoring systems may capture irregularities tied to accident trauma.

Insurers often dismiss pain and suffering claims as “subjective.” Wearable and medical data provide objective proof that injuries changed a victim’s health and lifestyle. Lawyers can connect this data to medical records and use it to strengthen the case for full compensation.

Why Preserving Electronic Evidence Is So Important

The biggest risk with electronic evidence is that it doesn’t last. Telematics systems overwrite older data, black boxes reset after new trips, and wearables only retain information for limited periods. Trucking companies, knowing this, may also delay releasing records until it is too late.

Victims rarely realize how quickly crucial information can vanish. In many cases, the only way to preserve data is by sending formal spoliation or preservation letters through an attorney. These legal notices require trucking companies and insurers to safeguard all relevant evidence.

Without prompt preservation, a case that could have been strong may collapse under a lack of proof. For Houston accident victims, taking fast action with legal support is the only way to ensure that evidence doesn’t slip away.

The Lawyer’s Role in Securing and Using Electronic Evidence

While vehicles, phones, and health devices generate valuable data, victims rarely have direct access to it. Trucking companies may refuse to share telematics, phone providers protect call logs, and health device records must be authenticated. Without legal pressure, much of this evidence disappears.

Lawyers take several steps to preserve and secure electronic records:

Preservation Letters: Formal demands that require companies to keep data intact.
Court Motions and Subpoenas: Legal tools that compel the release of black box downloads, GPS logs, and phone records.
Digital Forensics Experts: Specialists who recover and interpret raw data so it can be used in court.
Medical Expert Collaboration: Linking health device data to clinical records to show the true scope of injuries.

These steps require speed, authority, and technical knowledge. Victims trying to handle evidence themselves risk losing access or having insurers argue the data is unreliable. With a lawyer involved from the start, electronic evidence becomes a powerful tool for proving negligence and maximizing compensation.

Protect Your Rights with a Smith & Hassler Free Consultation

After a serious crash, the data inside vehicles, phones, and health devices can be the key to proving fault and showing the true cost of your injuries. But this evidence doesn’t last forever. And once it’s gone, so is your chance to use it.

Smith & Hassler has recovered more than $1 billion for injured Texans by acting fast to preserve electronic records, expose negligence, and demand full compensation. If you or a loved one has been hurt, don’t wait for insurers to take advantage of delays.

Contact Smith & Hassler today for a free consultation. The sooner you call, the stronger your case will be.

Click here for a printable PDF of this article, “Preserving Electronic Evidence in the Age of Vehicle Telematics and Wearable Tech.”