What Is the Attractive Nuisance Doctrine in Texas?

If your child was injured on someone else’s property, you need to know your legal rights and options

The Attractive Nuisance Doctrine is a legal principle that holds property owners responsible for injuries to children who trespass on their land due to an attractive but dangerous condition.

The concept of attractive nuisance emerged in the United States in premises liability cases during the late 19th century. The landmark case of Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Stout (1873) established the principle that property owners could be held liable for injuries to child trespassers caused by dangerous conditions on their property.

In Texas, the doctrine evolved through various court decisions. The Texas Supreme Court officially recognized the doctrine in 1932 in the case of Banker v. McLaughlin. Since then, Texas courts have refined and applied the doctrine in numerous cases.

What are the key elements of the Attractive Nuisance Doctrine in Texas?

Texas courts consider several elements when determining if the Attractive Nuisance Doctrine applies to a premises liability case. These include:

Artificial condition: The dangerous condition must be artificial, created, or maintained by the property owner.
Attractiveness to children: The condition must be likely to attract children who may not understand its dangers.
Unreasonable risk: The condition must pose an unreasonable risk of harm to children.
Child’s inability to appreciate danger: The children involved should be too young to understand the risks associated with the condition.
Property owner’s knowledge: The owner must know or have reason to know that children are likely to trespass and encounter the dangerous condition.

What responsibilities do property owners have under this doctrine?

Property owners in Texas must take reasonable precautions to prevent injuries to children who might be attracted to dangerous conditions on their property. This duty of care includes securing the property by fencing off or otherwise securing areas with potentially attractive nuisances.

Owners should also remove or modify hazards when possible to make them safer. Providing clear and visible signs warning of potential dangers can help mitigate liability. Additionally, property owners should regularly inspect their land for potential attractive nuisances and address any issues promptly.

What are some examples of an attractive nuisance?

Unsecured or easily accessible pools are among the most common and dangerous attractive nuisances. Texas law requires pool owners to install and maintain proper fencing and safety measures. The same applies to artificial bodies of water such as artificial ponds, fountains, or other decorative water features.

Unattended heavy equipment can also be dangerous to curious children. This often includes equipment used for home construction projects, power tools, old cars or farm equipment, or discarded machinery.

Additionally, trampolines, tree houses, and play structures can be dangerous to children when they are not properly maintained, secured, or supervised.

What are the most common types of premises liability accidents involving children?

Children are naturally curious and may not always recognize potential dangers. Some common types of premises liability accidents involving children in Texas include:

Swimming pool accidents: Unsecured or improperly maintained pools can lead to drowning or near-drowning incidents.
Playground injuries: Faulty equipment, improper surfacing, or inadequate supervision can result in serious injuries.
Dog bites: Children are often victims of dog attacks due to their size and inability to recognize warning signs.
Slip and fall accidents: Wet floors, uneven surfaces, or poorly maintained stairs can cause children to slip and suffer injuries.
Accidents with machinery: Children who come in contact with unattended or unsecured machinery risk sustaining serious injuries.

How are attractive nuisance cases investigated?

To establish premises liability in cases involving children in Texas, the following elements generally need to be proven: duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages.

This means the property owner must have owed a duty of care to the child and breached that duty by failing to maintain a safe environment or warn of known dangers. It must also be shown that this breach of duty directly caused the child’s injuries and that the child suffered actual damages as a result. It’s not enough for a child to simply be injured on the property; there must be clear evidence that the injury was a direct result of the property owner’s negligence.

A premises liability attorney will look for various information to build a strong case. This includes photographs and video footage that can visually document the dangerous condition of the property and the circumstances surrounding the accident. Witness statements are also crucial, as they provide firsthand accounts of the incident and the property’s condition.

The property owner’s maintenance logs and safety inspection reports are important for establishing whether the owner regularly maintained the property and took necessary safety precautions. Statements from safety experts, engineers, or child development specialists can offer professional insights into the safety of the property and whether it posed an attractive nuisance to children.

Lastly, the child’s medical records are essential for detailing the extent of the injuries sustained and the related medical expenses, which are necessary for proving damages in the case.

What arguments do insurance companies make in premises liability cases involving children?

Insurance companies representing property owners often use strategies to minimize liability or deny claims in premises liability cases involving children, which is why it’s so important to get an attorney involved as soon as possible.

Remember, insurance companies are in business to make money, so they are always looking for ways to reduce liability. For example, they might make the following claims, even if they aren’t true:

The property owner was unaware of the dangerous condition.
Sufficient warnings or safety measures were in place.
Parents failed to properly supervise the child.
The child or parents were aware of the risks and chose to proceed anyway.
The child was not permitted on the property, though this argument may be limited by the attractive nuisance doctrine.

How much is my child’s premises liability claim worth?

The amount of money you can seek for your child’s injuries depends on the severity of the injuries, the amount of damages accrued, and how liability is allocated. The damages you and your child may be eligible for include (but are not limited to):

Medical expenses for treatment, rehabilitation, medication, and medical equipment.
Pain and suffering for physical pain and emotional distress experienced by the child.
Loss of future earning capacity if the injury impacts your child’s ability to work in the future.
Disability or disfigurement for permanent physical impairments or visible scars.
Loss of enjoyment of life for the child’s reduced ability to participate in normal activities and hobbies.
Educational expenses if the injury affects the child’s ability to learn or requires special educational services.
Parental damages for lost wages if you have to take time off work to care for your injured child.

Before accepting a settlement from the property owner’s insurance company, it’s important to let an attorney fully investigate the incident and determine the claim’s value. This could take time as your attorney calculates medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other damages until your child reaches maximum medical improvement.

Our attorneys can help you demand accountability

If your child was injured on another person’s property, it’s important to know your rights and take immediate action. When property owners and insurance companies try to minimize liability and shift the blame, the attorneys at Smith & Hassler are here to help.

With over 30 years of experience winning complex cases in Houston and throughout Harris County, we’ve secured substantial compensation for our clients, including:

$160,000 for a shopper who slipped on a liquid spill in a retail store.
$275,000 for a worker who suffered broken teeth and facial lacerations on the job.
$71,535 for a client whose fingertip was bitten off by a loose neighborhood dog.

We can investigate your child’s accident, gather key evidence, and build a strong case for the maximum compensation your family deserves. Contact us today for a free case evaluation. Our attorneys work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing unless we win your case. Don’t wait – let us start fighting for you.

Click here to download a printable PDF of this article, “What Is the Attractive Nuisance Doctrine in Texas?”